At 9:45 AM on April 28, 2025, at Parliament, Priṣṭh Wachrasindhu, opposition coalition coordinator and Phak Prachasanchai representative, discussed collecting parliamentary signatures to submit to the Supreme Court for establishing an NACC investigation committee regarding alleged misconduct in the Saksayam Chidchob case involving stock manipulation. He stated this is a public communication matter and will brief other opposition parties. After the NACC dismissed Saksayam's case, the opposition views the NACC statement as potentially a whitewashing effort, given clear evidence of stock involvement, necessitating use of Constitutional Article 236 to request the parliamentary speaker refer the matter to the Supreme Court for investigating NACC officials for misconduct.

Priṣṭh explained two signature submission channels: parliament members requiring 140 signatures (the Democratic Party has 119), supplemented by other opposition parties; and senators, with over 10 already interested. A third route involves 20,000 public signatures, and he called for public participation from those viewing the NACC resolution as misconduct.

"Dual parallel submission pathways would address concerns that the parliamentary speaker might dismiss the complaint, as former Speaker Wannasai did before the 120-day dissolution regarding NACC officials," Priṣṭh stated.

He noted different parties' positions would emerge during today's opposition coalition meeting, with some potentially needing internal party discussions before committing. When asked whether pre-negotiations with the speaker were necessary, Priṣṭh responded such decisions shouldn't depend on backroom talks. Constitutionally, parliamentarians cannot directly submit to the Supreme Court—they must go through the speaker, who exercises discretion.

Former Speaker Wannasai previously dismissed an NACC investigation petition regarding a watch case involving former Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan, using discretion without explanation before the 120-day dissolution. Concerns also include timeframe issues, as Wannasai's case took 10 months before dismissal.

Priṣṭh called on Speaker Sompon to clarify evaluation criteria for both submission systems: whether decisions would be based on which party the case involves, or clear timeframes not exceeding specific days or months.

Honey Trap, a retro rock band fronted by vocalist and sound therapist Phloi Prom Proemwong, is undergoing intensive rehearsals for the American University Alumni (AUA) association concert scheduled for May 3rd. The band recently held a major rehearsal at Le Tana, with Phloi Prom describing this as no ordinary concert, featuring over 50 songs that required a full year of preparation. The event will showcase three legendary bands rarely seen together: Honey Trap, the iconic Siamese Cats led by Khon Thaepphayangkuri, and the Band of Brothers led by Siao Song of True Corporation.

Honey Trap consists of master-level musicians including conductor Reuangyot Phimthong, a Grammy award recipient with six Prachinamalinee awards, and guitarist Kitti Kuntiyangkur, a former Blue Angel member with over 30 years in the music industry. The band will be joined by Jonas Anderson, a foreign singer known for performing Thai country music, as well as other notable musicians.

Reuangyot Phimthong explained that the concert will feature exclusively foreign songs from the 1970s-1990s era, requiring an entire year of preparation to rehearse over 50 pieces. Jonas Anderson expressed his excitement about joining the performance, noting that although he typically sings Thai music, the exceptional talent of this team made it impossible to refuse. The concert takes place on May 3rd at the Novotel Sukhumvit 20, with tickets available through Thai Ticket.

On April 28, 2026, representatives from five ride-hailing driver associations gathered at Government House to submit a petition to the Prime Minister demanding urgent action on legal reforms and cost-of-living issues affecting their profession. The coalition, led by Vorapon Gaemkhunthod, included the Public Taxi Driver Professional Association, Lukkled Team Public Ride-Hailing Association, Thailand Motorcycle Taxi Riders Association, EV Electric Motorcycle Taxi Riders Association, and Thailand Riders Association. The groups emphasized that taxi drivers, motorcycle taxi riders, tuk-tuk operators, and minibus drivers face severe hardship from continuously rising fuel prices, which erode their income and threaten their survival. The associations presented six major demands to the government: strict and fair enforcement of digital platform laws, penalties against non-compliant ride-hailing apps operating in Thailand, promotion of a state-developed public ride-hailing application, and reforms to taxi laws and regulations to reduce operational costs and create better business opportunities. They also proposed extending taxi vehicle lifespan from the current 9-year limit to 12 years, and up to 15 years for electric taxis, while requesting government authority to set appropriate fares in Bangkok and other provinces reflecting current economic conditions. Deputy Transport Minister Siripong Angkaskulkiarti emerged to receive the petition and held discussions with the driver associations and relevant government agencies.

Young actor Nike Nithidol is launching a project to take fans on a merit-making temple trip to enhance their wisdom and fortune at Wat Chuk Choe in Chachoengsao Province. Singer Bell Niphada wrote and composed the song "Phu Bao Isaan" herself, which started as a viral TikTok trend and has now been developed into a full musical version with Bell serving as producer. The single maintains Bell's signature bright and friendly charm, and is available on all streaming platforms with a music video at https://youtu.be/hI9tv1FQepQ. Prime Video has announced that "Citadel" Season 2 will stream on May 6, following the story of Mason Kane (Richard Madden), Nadia Singh (Priyanka Chopra Jonas), and Bernard Orlick (Stanley Tucci) as three elite spies from a destroyed organization are pulled back into action when a new threat emerges. The concert teaser for "Boom Boom Concert" featuring Ott-Peach and others has been released, with performances scheduled for September 26-27 at Siam Paragon Hall 5. Actor Nike Nithidol is also organizing a merit-making temple trip taking fans to receive blessings from respected monks including Luang Pho Chang Tejabanyo at Wat Chuk Choe, listen to dharma teachings, and participate in fruit parties. Interested fans can join the trip on May 22-24 by contacting 08-4664-4195 or Line: lucky4239645.

On April 28, 2025, Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Suphajee Suthumpun posted clarifications on Facebook regarding the live-commerce durian sales controversy, providing six key points.

The Ministry forecasts durian production will be 33% higher than last year, prompting aggressive marketing plans for both domestic and international markets to prevent surplus inventory.

Live commerce is one marketing channel that enables rapid and wide product distribution. The Ministry has partnered with multiple influencers domestically and internationally, each employing different marketing methods, with no preferential ministry support for any particular influencer.

Regarding influencer Pimmy Pie, she intends to assist farmers with voluntary buyer-seller agreements, and her sales techniques and promotions may have specific conditions or timeframes.

On concerns about product quality discrepancies, the Minister noted public enthusiasm is so strong that the products will be closely watched, and regulatory authorities are already monitoring closely.

Current durian prices remain healthy: export-grade AB ranges from 135-150 baht per kilogram, grade C from 90-100 baht, grade D from 70-80 baht, and mixed grades from 125-130 baht per kilogram, varying by product quality.

The collaboration with influencers aims to manage the upcoming surplus production and deliver yields to consumers swiftly.

Boom Panadda has responded calmly to Pu Mantana's accusations, admitting her confusion and stating that had this happened ten years ago she might have countersued, but today she simply lacks the energy to fight with anyone. She also addressed concerns about the military rank issue involved in the case.

The controversy began when Pu Mantana posted a clip criticizing Boom Panadda, the host of the Clear program, which had interviewed both parties regarding Pu Mantana's debt issues from 2567. Pu Mantana claimed Boom had commented on her private matters without consent, using language that appeared to influence public opinion.

Boom later gave an interview explaining that the show had contacted Pu Mantana, but her lawyer arrived in her place instead. Pu Mantana then fired back with an angry post, accusing Boom of lying to society and claiming that neither Boom nor the show ever invited her to appear.

When encountered by media at the opening of Implant Dental Center at The Wireless Club, Ground Floor, One Bangkok, Boom opened up about the situation.

Regarding Pu Mantana and the controversy:

"Honestly, I don't want to respond to what happened with Pu Mantana because I'm still confused about what actually occurred. The interview footage about Pu Mantana from two years ago and the format where both sides would discuss things—I had no idea that would happen. I was simply the host of the Clear program. The producer decides who to contact and who to interview on any given day—I only find out when I arrive at the studio."

"But out of professional responsibility, we interview everyone and everything—whether they're criminals, UFOs, ghosts, whatever. I interview them all. So I didn't know beforehand that the guests would be Pu's representative and lawyer Khun Pramarn. Based on my understanding, looking back two years, Pu was stressed and depressed, so we asked her lawyer, Khun Pramarn, questions, and he naturally sided with Pu."

"If Pu says we never contacted her and I didn't know why Khun Pramarn was sitting there representing her, then I'd suggest Pu sue Khun Pramarn for sitting there in her name without authorization. He answered questions until the public was dissatisfied, asking why the money wasn't returned and so on. I'd suggest Pu sue Khun Pramarn because I simply didn't know how he came to sit there in her place. If Pu didn't authorize it, Khun Pramarn had no right to sit there representing her. That's something I was completely unaware of—Pu needs to sue her lawyer."

Did you have any personal contact or conversation, or did you only see the attacks through media?

"I only saw it when suddenly there was criticism, which is why I said I'm still confused until now, because:

1. I have no responsibility for inviting guests. I have no idea who the guests are. 2. This happened two years ago, and the show format has since changed and become political. Now I can't even invite Pu because it's become too political, so I'm still confused about what happened. 3. Every show is covering this. News programs, talk shows—all of them are covering Pu's story because it's such a big issue. So I'm confused about what actually happened. And previously, I haven't touched on anything about Pu at all. Even when reading news on entertainment programs, I only read the headline because we all know how sensitive Pu's feelings are."

They said don't lie to society?

"The claim about lying to society is that we never contacted her. That's where I became confused...