On April 30, Agriculture and Cooperatives Minister Suriya Jurungruangkit explained the cabinet resolution transferring Rachen Silpaprayya from his position as director-general of the Royal Rainmaking and Agricultural Aviation Department to inspector-general, stating it was a management-based restructuring unrelated to personal matters as alleged.

Suriya emphasized that regarding claims his grandson attempted to contact the director-general since July 2025, he had no involvement at that time as he was serving at the Transport Ministry. Concerning allegations of contact records from March and April 2026, Suriya said he was unaware beforehand and only learned about it from news reports. He confirmed his grandson did make contact attempts but insisted that had he known in advance, he would have informed the director-general. He stressed he never received direct communication from his grandson about this matter.

Regarding accusations that his grandson visited the office, Suriya dismissed these as inconsistent with facts, noting the director-general never granted him a meeting, even once. He argued that although they are relatives, everyone leads their own separate lives—he works in politics while others pursue business ventures with no connection between them.

Suriya reiterated that the transfer would proceed regardless of this controversy, as it was decided for overall administrative efficiency. With agriculture facing numerous challenges, the sector requires capable leaders to implement policies swiftly and effectively. All procedures are transparent, auditable, and unrelated to political concerns.

Suriya stated that if anyone questions his actions or believes they were improper, they can seek clarification or take legal recourse. However, if Rachen continues making unfounded accusations causing damage without evidence, he may also exercise his legal rights.

On April 30, 2025, at Parliament, Pakornut Udomphipatthanakul, a Pheu Thai party-list MP, spoke regarding the National Anti-Corruption Commission's (NACC) dismissal of a complaint about former Transport Minister Saksiam Chidchob's alleged hidden stock holdings—a case initially filed by the Pheu Thai party. The NACC argued that stock transfers were properly recorded through accounting, and after the Constitutional Court ruled, Saksiam updated his asset declarations and sued the nominee shareholder. Pakornut demanded the NACC prove Saksiam's intent to conceal assets in declarations filed before 2019, noting the Constitutional Court's ruling did not establish prior intent to hide assets. The NACC appeared to misapply criminal proof standards; demonstrating guilt beyond reasonable doubt is the court's responsibility, not the NACC's.

"I believe the NACC misunderstands its own role," Pakornut stated. "In the justice system, it is the court's duty to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, not the NACC."

Parkornut further noted the NACC should function like police or prosecutors. If evidence warrants charges, the court should decide guilt or innocence—not the NACC. If using the NACC's standard, he questioned whether the financial evidence in the Constitutional Court regarding stock transfers by Buricharoen Company, tracing funds from Saksiam to the alleged nominee, had been examined by the NACC and what reasons justified dismissing the hidden asset claim.

Parkornut demanded the NACC disclose all documents, including fact-finding reports, witness statements, employee opinions, and committee meeting records. Since an administrative court ruled that case documents lose confidential status after case closure, the NACC must release them publicly or face penalties. He warned that if disclosure doesn't occur within the week, he will visit NACC headquarters to formally request evidence release.

Regarding signature collection for a Supreme Court petition to establish an NACC investigating committee, Pakornut said the opposition coalition is forming a working group to draft and submit a petition to the parliamentary speaker. He expects no problems gathering signatures, targeting submission by May 2025, noting that access to Saksiam's complete case documents would help strengthen the petition.

When asked if he would sign a constitutional amendment (Article 236) petition to restrict the speaker's discretion simultaneously, Pakornut clarified these are separate efforts. The amendment petition requires only Pheu Thai's parliamentary votes. He did not elaborate on discussions with other opposition parties regarding these matters.

Don't wait for market saturation—the Commerce Ministry is launching an aggressive live commerce push to drive Thai fruits into foreign markets while supporting farmer prices, targeting 179 billion baht in fruit exports this year.

Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Suphajee Suthummaphan announced the strategy of placing Thai durian on live commerce platforms, aligning with the ministry's plan to generate demand ahead of major harvest volumes. This systematic approach manages product distribution and prevents supply bottlenecks. Starting May 10, Eastern Thailand's durian production will gradually flood markets through June, alongside other seasonal fruits. This proactive management strategy helps spread distribution, reduce concentrated supply risks, and stabilize prices—far better than waiting for oversupply before implementing emergency measures.

Beyond domestic measures, the Commerce Ministry is aggressively promoting all Thai fruits to global markets. In 2025, Thailand exported 2,080,049 tons of fresh fruit valued at 171,206 million baht, up 1.1% from the previous year. The top three export markets are China (88.1%), Malaysia (2.2%), and Indonesia (2.1%).

In the first three months of 2025 (January-March), Thailand exported 305,673 tons of fresh fruit worth 22,285 million baht, a 56.2% increase. Fresh durian exports reached 101,773 tons valued at 14,215 million baht, surging 181%.

The Commerce Ministry plans to penetrate foreign markets strategically to accelerate domestic fruit distribution and benefit Thai farmers. Key initiatives already implemented this year include:

1) Business matching events for fresh fruit, processed products, and agricultural goods on March 5, 2025, generating 3,120.51 million baht in negotiated trade value between 101 Thai exporters and 90 importers from 18 countries.

2) High-level executive missions to Hanoi, Lang Son province (Vietnam), Nanning, and Guangzhou (China) between April 23-25, 2025, to facilitate smooth transportation and resolve obstacles for the 2025 fruit season through Vietnam's northern border to Southern China.

Upcoming promotional activities for 2025 include:

1) Thaifex-Anuga Asia 2026 food exhibition, Southeast Asia's largest, scheduled May 26-30 at IMPACT Muang Thong Thani, featuring 3,300 exhibitors and over 140,000 international participants.

2) Fruit promotion campaigns in seven major Chinese cities under the Thai Tropical Fruits Golden Months project: Shanghai, Xiamen, Nanning, Chengdu, Qingdao, Guangzhou, and Kunming.

3) Expanded activities throughout 2025.

A dormitory resident has gone viral online after sharing her monthly utility bill that left her shocked. She reported staying in her room full-time, running the air conditioner only while sleeping, and using just one computer, yet her electric bill reached a staggering 6,966 baht—nearly double her 3,500 baht room fee. She posted: "I stay in the room all the time, only turn on the AC when sleeping, use one computer. Is this normal? Room: 3,500 baht, Electricity: 6,966 baht. It's like factory electricity rates."

The post generated significant online attention and numerous comments, with the overwhelming majority agreeing the charges are abnormal. One commenter noted that using 774 electricity units as a single occupant is excessive, suggesting the air conditioner is likely very old with a low efficiency rating combined with a high electricity rate of 9 baht per unit. Another commenter stated the situation is impossible, claiming their entire household uses only around 500 units monthly even with the air conditioner running day and night plus other appliances. A third commenter shared a similar comparison, saying her home with two air conditioners and various other appliances used only 500 units this month, suggesting the meter may be malfunctioning.

On April 30, 2025, at Parliament, Romdan Panjor, a People's Party list MP, held a press conference following House Speaker Sompong Amornvej's rejection of a proposal to establish a committee to monitor the attempted assassination of Nakhon Si Thammarat MP Kamolasakdi Leewamor. Romdan expressed his disappointment, noting that there are significant obstacles and concerns in gathering evidence and tracking case progress.

Currently, Kamolasakdi must personally collect evidence and file complaints. Recently, he filed charges against two naval officers in an attempted murder case, pending clarification from the newly formed Region 9 Police investigative unit on whether they will interrogate the suspects and complainants. The interrogation deadline was today, but progress remains limited. The public is concerned that despite arresting five alleged assassins, Kamolasakdi has filed additional complaints. There are questions about whether the case will be split into two cases, requiring close monitoring. MPs from border-area electoral districts in the southern region must be vigilant, as this directly impacts their work. Kamolasakdi has now missed two weeks of parliamentary sessions due to evidence gathering in the field.

Romdan further stated that the shooting is not an attack on an individual MP, but a challenge to democratic political institutions, requiring protective measures. He will monitor the case and maintain continuous communication with the House Speaker.

The public perceives this case not as a personal matter but as a security issue connected to certain agencies, involving political motivations. Public observers are noting possible attempts to distort or deflect from the main issues, requiring close attention to whether investigators work transparently based on evidence.

Romdan recommended that the government elevate the Kamolasakdi shooting case to special status to ensure neutral, professional evidence gathering, as local police resources may be insufficient. He urged the government to prioritize transparency, correctness, fairness, and professionalism in this case.

There are also suspicions regarding deliberate distortion of the narrative, with suspected information operations using degrading content against politicians, journalists, activists, and civil society members. Romdan interpreted this as a planned and recurring operation.

He called for close monitoring as this affects political institutions and the need for safe spaces for public voices. Otherwise, resolving southern Thailand's problems through peaceful means will be difficult.

"It's unfortunate the House Speaker deflected the issue. From now on, we must use parliamentary committees as mechanisms to monitor progress, conduct close oversight, and ensure this case is transparent, professional, and scientific, pushing it under DSI responsibility," Romdan said.

Chayapol Satad, a Bangkok People's Party MP, noted that the case involves government resources. When people demand facts, authorities use memory-creating strategies and IO operations to deflect, cover up news, and create stories based on anger and hatred to distract public attention.

Kittipong Piyawanno, a People's Party list MP and former military officer, commented on IO operations, noting his background in such operations from military training.